French A/L Overlap - Revision history

Noeth at 13:24, 18 February 2026

2026-02-18T13:24:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:24, 18 February 2026
Line 4:		Line 4:
	\|Has Parent Version=Overlap of Versions A and L		\|Has Parent Version=Overlap of Versions A and L
	\|Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome		\|Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome
	~~\|Is Adapted From=French Version A; L (Sept Sages de Rome)~~
	\|Has Language Of Version=Old French		\|Has Language Of Version=Old French
	\|Has Place Of Text Composition=France		\|Has Place Of Text Composition=France
	~~\|Has Text Language=Old French~~
	\|Has Modern Research Literature=Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014); Coco (2016); Berne-Aïache (1966); Foehr-Janssens (1994); ARLIMA: Les sept sages		\|Has Modern Research Literature=Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014); Coco (2016); Berne-Aïache (1966); Foehr-Janssens (1994); ARLIMA: Les sept sages
			\|Is Adapted From=French Version A; L (Sept Sages de Rome)
	\|Has Note=The story order, below, reflects the story order given in [[Cambridge University Library MS Gg.6.28]], and in [[Bibliothèque nationale de France, français 95]]. The other three manuscripts in this group contain some, but not all, of the variations shown here in the final six stories.		\|Has Note=The story order, below, reflects the story order given in [[Cambridge University Library MS Gg.6.28]], and in [[Bibliothèque nationale de France, français 95]]. The other three manuscripts in this group contain some, but not all, of the variations shown here in the final six stories.
	}}		}}

Noeth: Text replacement - "Has Original Language Of Version" to "Has Language Of Version"

2026-01-27T11:22:13Z

Text replacement - "Has Original Language Of Version" to "Has Language Of Version"

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:22, 27 January 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:
	\|Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome		\|Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome
	\|Is Adapted From=French Version A; L (Sept Sages de Rome)		\|Is Adapted From=French Version A; L (Sept Sages de Rome)
	\|Has ~~Original~~ Language Of Version=Old French		\|Has Language Of Version=Old French
	\|Has Place Of Text Composition=France		\|Has Place Of Text Composition=France
	\|Has Text Language=Old French		\|Has Text Language=Old French

Noeth: Text replacement - "Has Branch Of Tradition=West" to "Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome"

2025-12-03T12:41:43Z

Text replacement - "Has Branch Of Tradition=West" to "Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome"

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:41, 3 December 2025
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\|Has Language Within Version=French		\|Has Language Within Version=French
	\|Has Parent Version=Overlap of Versions A and L		\|Has Parent Version=Overlap of Versions A and L
	\|Has Branch Of Tradition=~~West~~		\|Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome
	\|Is Adapted From=French Version A; L (Sept Sages de Rome)		\|Is Adapted From=French Version A; L (Sept Sages de Rome)
	\|Has Original Language Of Version=Old French		\|Has Original Language Of Version=Old French

Noeth at 09:22, 25 August 2025

2025-08-25T09:22:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:22, 25 August 2025
Line 2:		Line 2:
	\|Has Description=The French [[French Version A\|version A]] and [[L (Sept Sages de Rome)\|version L]] of the ''Roman des Sept Sages'' are closely related to each other. The two traditions are essentially identical for the first 11 stories, before L differs dramatically, omitting [[Vidua]] and [[Vaticinium]] and instead including [[Filia]] and [[Noverca]]. Version L also contains fewer stories than Version A. However, a significant number of manuscripts that closely follow the text and pattern of Version A, and are designated as such by most contemporary scholarship, also contain one or both of the additional Version L stories, Filia and Noverca. This marked distinction demonstrates the cross-pollenation betweek A and L, and shows how closely and constantly interlinked the manuscript composition of these traditions must have been. Because these manuscripts are so distinct from the other A texts, and because recent pieces of scholarship (Runte, Coco, Foehr-Janssens, Speer, the Arlima database, etc.) sometimes group them in different ways, they appear here rather than in the A or L groups.		\|Has Description=The French [[French Version A\|version A]] and [[L (Sept Sages de Rome)\|version L]] of the ''Roman des Sept Sages'' are closely related to each other. The two traditions are essentially identical for the first 11 stories, before L differs dramatically, omitting [[Vidua]] and [[Vaticinium]] and instead including [[Filia]] and [[Noverca]]. Version L also contains fewer stories than Version A. However, a significant number of manuscripts that closely follow the text and pattern of Version A, and are designated as such by most contemporary scholarship, also contain one or both of the additional Version L stories, Filia and Noverca. This marked distinction demonstrates the cross-pollenation betweek A and L, and shows how closely and constantly interlinked the manuscript composition of these traditions must have been. Because these manuscripts are so distinct from the other A texts, and because recent pieces of scholarship (Runte, Coco, Foehr-Janssens, Speer, the Arlima database, etc.) sometimes group them in different ways, they appear here rather than in the A or L groups.
	\|Has Language Within Version=French		\|Has Language Within Version=French
			\|Has Parent Version=Overlap of Versions A and L
	\|Has Branch Of Tradition=West		\|Has Branch Of Tradition=West
	\|Is Adapted From=French Version A; L (Sept Sages de Rome)		\|Is Adapted From=French Version A; L (Sept Sages de Rome)

Noeth at 18:52, 27 February 2025

2025-02-27T18:52:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:52, 27 February 2025
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\|Has Language Within Version=French		\|Has Language Within Version=French
	\|Has Branch Of Tradition=West		\|Has Branch Of Tradition=West
	\|Is Adapted From=L (Sept Sages de Rome)~~, French Version A~~		\|Is Adapted From=French Version A; L (Sept Sages de Rome)
	\|Has Original Language Of Version=Old French		\|Has Original Language Of Version=Old French
	\|Has Place Of Text Composition=France		\|Has Place Of Text Composition=France

Bonsall at 16:10, 4 February 2025

2025-02-04T16:10:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 4 February 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Secondary Version		{{Secondary Version
	\|Has Description=The French ~~versions~~ A and L of the ''Roman des Sept Sages'' are closely related to each other. The two traditions are essentially identical for the first 11 stories, before L differs dramatically, omitting [[Vidua]] and [[Vaticinium]] and instead including [[Filia]] and [[Noverca]]. Version L also contains fewer stories than Version A. However, a significant number of manuscripts that closely follow the text and pattern of Version A, and are designated as such by most contemporary scholarship, also contain one or both of the additional Version L stories, Filia and Noverca. This marked distinction demonstrates the cross-pollenation betweek A and L, and shows how closely and constantly interlinked the manuscript composition of these traditions must have been. Because these manuscripts are so distinct from the other A texts, and because recent pieces of scholarship (Runte, Coco, Foehr-Janssens, Speer, the Arlima database, etc.) sometimes group them in different ways, they appear here rather than in the A or L groups.		\|Has Description=The French [[French Version A\|version A]] and [[L (Sept Sages de Rome)\|version L]] of the ''Roman des Sept Sages'' are closely related to each other. The two traditions are essentially identical for the first 11 stories, before L differs dramatically, omitting [[Vidua]] and [[Vaticinium]] and instead including [[Filia]] and [[Noverca]]. Version L also contains fewer stories than Version A. However, a significant number of manuscripts that closely follow the text and pattern of Version A, and are designated as such by most contemporary scholarship, also contain one or both of the additional Version L stories, Filia and Noverca. This marked distinction demonstrates the cross-pollenation betweek A and L, and shows how closely and constantly interlinked the manuscript composition of these traditions must have been. Because these manuscripts are so distinct from the other A texts, and because recent pieces of scholarship (Runte, Coco, Foehr-Janssens, Speer, the Arlima database, etc.) sometimes group them in different ways, they appear here rather than in the A or L groups.
	\|Has Language Within Version=French		\|Has Language Within Version=French
	\|Has Branch Of Tradition=West		\|Has Branch Of Tradition=West

Bonsall at 13:24, 31 January 2025

2025-01-31T13:24:48Z

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 |Has Text Language=Old French
 |Has Modern Research Literature=Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014); Coco (2016); Berne-Aïache (1966); Foehr-Janssens (1994); ARLIMA: Les sept sages
 }}

Bonsall at 16:35, 30 January 2025

2025-01-30T16:35:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:35, 30 January 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Secondary Version		{{Secondary Version
			\|Has Description=The French versions A and L of the ''Roman des Sept Sages'' are closely related to each other. The two traditions are essentially identical for the first 11 stories, before L differs dramatically, omitting [[Vidua]] and [[Vaticinium]] and instead including [[Filia]] and [[Noverca]]. Version L also contains fewer stories than Version A. However, a significant number of manuscripts that closely follow the text and pattern of Version A, and are designated as such by most contemporary scholarship, also contain one or both of the additional Version L stories, Filia and Noverca. This marked distinction demonstrates the cross-pollenation betweek A and L, and shows how closely and constantly interlinked the manuscript composition of these traditions must have been. Because these manuscripts are so distinct from the other A texts, and because recent pieces of scholarship (Runte, Coco, Foehr-Janssens, Speer, the Arlima database, etc.) sometimes group them in different ways, they appear here rather than in the A or L groups.
	\|Has Language Within Version=French		\|Has Language Within Version=French
			\|Has Branch Of Tradition=West
			\|Is Adapted From=L (Sept Sages de Rome), French Version A
			\|Has Original Language Of Version=Old French
			\|Has Place Of Text Composition=France
			\|Has Text Language=Old French
			\|Has Modern Research Literature=Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014); Coco (2016); Berne-Aïache (1966); Foehr-Janssens (1994); ARLIMA: Les sept sages
	}}		}}

Bonsall: Created page with "{{Secondary Version |Has Language Within Version=French }}"

2024-05-23T11:55:23Z

Created page with "{{Secondary Version |Has Language Within Version=French }}"

New page