L (Sept Sages de Rome) - Revision history

Noeth at 12:07, 23 February 2026

2026-02-23T12:07:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:07, 23 February 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	While this pattern (fewer and different tales, in a distinct order) links the manuscripts below, there are also redactions of the ''Sept Sages'' that follow Version A's pattern, but include Noverca, Filia, or both. The presence of these texts, which seem so clearly linked to Version L's distinctive pattern, in texts that otherwise resemble Version A therefore serves as both evidence of the proximity of these two versions, and an argument for their cross-pollination. See the manuscripts filed under [[French A/L Overlap]] for more on this.		While this pattern (fewer and different tales, in a distinct order) links the manuscripts below, there are also redactions of the ''Sept Sages'' that follow Version A's pattern, but include Noverca, Filia, or both. The presence of these texts, which seem so clearly linked to Version L's distinctive pattern, in texts that otherwise resemble Version A therefore serves as both evidence of the proximity of these two versions, and an argument for their cross-pollination. See the manuscripts filed under [[French A/L Overlap]] for more on this.
	\|Has Title=Roman des Sept Sages		\|Has Title=Roman des Sept Sages
	~~\|Has Siglum=L (Sept Sages de Rome)~~
	\|Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome		\|Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome
	\|Is Adapted From=A (Seven Sages)		\|Is Adapted From=A (Seven Sages)

Noeth at 13:33, 18 February 2026

2026-02-18T13:33:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:33, 18 February 2026
Line 15:		Line 15:
	\|Has End Date Of Composition=1250		\|Has End Date Of Composition=1250
	\|Has Source For Date Of Text Composition=Foehr-Janssens (1994)		\|Has Source For Date Of Text Composition=Foehr-Janssens (1994)
	~~\|Has Text Language=Old French~~
	\|Has Modern Research Literature=Berne-Aïache (1966); Berne-Aïache (1977); Brereton (1953); Coco (2016); Foehr-Janssens (1994); Gilleland (1981); Maulu (2016); Paris (1876); Roques (1983); Runte (1971); Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Speer (1981); Speer (1989); Le Roux de Lincy (1838)		\|Has Modern Research Literature=Berne-Aïache (1966); Berne-Aïache (1977); Brereton (1953); Coco (2016); Foehr-Janssens (1994); Gilleland (1981); Maulu (2016); Paris (1876); Roques (1983); Runte (1971); Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Speer (1981); Speer (1989); Le Roux de Lincy (1838)
	\|Has Modern Edition=Le Roux de Lincy, Roman des Sept Sages de Rome (1838)		\|Has Modern Edition=Le Roux de Lincy, Roman des Sept Sages de Rome (1838)

Noeth: Text replacement - "Has Original Language Of Version" to "Has Language Of Version"

2026-01-27T11:22:16Z

Text replacement - "Has Original Language Of Version" to "Has Language Of Version"

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:22, 27 January 2026
Line 11:		Line 11:
	\|Is Adapted Into=Overlap of Versions A and L; French Version L; Catalan Version L		\|Is Adapted Into=Overlap of Versions A and L; French Version L; Catalan Version L
	\|Has Source For Composition And Adaption Information=Runte (1974); Campbell (1907); Foehr-Janssens (1994)		\|Has Source For Composition And Adaption Information=Runte (1974); Campbell (1907); Foehr-Janssens (1994)
	\|Has ~~Original~~ Language Of Version=Old French		\|Has Language Of Version=Old French
	\|Has Start Date Of Composition=1200		\|Has Start Date Of Composition=1200
	\|Has End Date Of Composition=1250		\|Has End Date Of Composition=1250

Noeth: Text replacement - "Has Branch Of Tradition=West" to "Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome"

2025-12-03T12:41:43Z

Text replacement - "Has Branch Of Tradition=West" to "Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome"

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:41, 3 December 2025
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\|Has Title=Roman des Sept Sages		\|Has Title=Roman des Sept Sages
	\|Has Siglum=L (Sept Sages de Rome)		\|Has Siglum=L (Sept Sages de Rome)
	\|Has Branch Of Tradition=~~West~~		\|Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome
	\|Is Adapted From=A (Seven Sages)		\|Is Adapted From=A (Seven Sages)
	\|Is Adapted Into=Overlap of Versions A and L; French Version L; Catalan Version L		\|Is Adapted Into=Overlap of Versions A and L; French Version L; Catalan Version L

Bonsall at 09:39, 1 July 2025

2025-07-01T09:39:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:39, 1 July 2025
Line 2:		Line 2:
	\|Has Description=Version L of the ''Roman des Sept Sages de Rome'', named for the early editor Le Roux de Lincy, is closely related to other ''Sept Sages'' versions, in particular [[A (Seven Sages)\|Version A]], and [[S (Scala Coeli)]].		\|Has Description=Version L of the ''Roman des Sept Sages de Rome'', named for the early editor Le Roux de Lincy, is closely related to other ''Sept Sages'' versions, in particular [[A (Seven Sages)\|Version A]], and [[S (Scala Coeli)]].

	Version L is unusual for a few reasons. It is worth noting that althought Version L exactly follows Version A for the first 11 stories (through [[Sapientes]]), the two traditions diverge sharply from there on. Version L includes thirteen, rather than fifteen, stories: the story told by the final sage, usually called Meron or Merons in the French, is absent, as is the prince's story, [[Vaticinium]]; this version does not include the stories [[Vidua]], [[Roma]], or [[Inclusa]]. In their place are two final stories - [[Noverca]] and [[Filia]] - which are found only in this version, and in [[S (Scala Coeli)\|Version S]].		Version L is unusual for a few reasons. It is worth noting that althought Version L exactly follows Version A for the first 11 stories (through [[Sapientes]]), the two traditions diverge sharply from there on. Version L includes thirteen, rather than fifteen, stories: the story told by the final sage, usually called Meron or Merons in the French, is absent, as is the prince's story, [[Vaticinium]]; this version does not include the stories [[Vidua]], [[Roma]], or [[Inclusa]]. In their place are two final stories - [[Noverca]] and [[Filia]] - which are found only in this version, and in [[S (Scala Coeli)\|Version S]]. Version L also includes the episode of the judicial duel, in which the Empress's champion is defeated by the champion fighting for the prince.

	While this pattern (fewer and different tales, in a distinct order) links the manuscripts below, there are also redactions of the ''Sept Sages'' that follow Version A's pattern, but include Noverca, Filia, or both. The presence of these texts, which seem so clearly linked to Version L's distinctive pattern, in texts that otherwise resemble Version A therefore serves as both evidence of the proximity of these two versions, and an argument for their cross-pollination. See the manuscripts filed under [[French A/L Overlap]] for more on this.		While this pattern (fewer and different tales, in a distinct order) links the manuscripts below, there are also redactions of the ''Sept Sages'' that follow Version A's pattern, but include Noverca, Filia, or both. The presence of these texts, which seem so clearly linked to Version L's distinctive pattern, in texts that otherwise resemble Version A therefore serves as both evidence of the proximity of these two versions, and an argument for their cross-pollination. See the manuscripts filed under [[French A/L Overlap]] for more on this.

Bonsall at 10:25, 24 April 2025

2025-04-24T10:25:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:25, 24 April 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Version		{{Version
	\|Has Description=Version L of the ''Roman des Sept Sages de Rome'', named for the early editor Le Roux de Lincy, is closely related to other ''Sept Sages'' versions, in particular [[A (Seven Sages)\|Version A]], and S (Scala ~~Celi~~).		\|Has Description=Version L of the ''Roman des Sept Sages de Rome'', named for the early editor Le Roux de Lincy, is closely related to other ''Sept Sages'' versions, in particular [[A (Seven Sages)\|Version A]], and [[S (Scala Coeli)]].

	Version L is unusual for a few reasons. It is worth noting that althought Version L exactly follows Version A for the first 11 stories (through [[Sapientes]]), the two traditions diverge sharply from there on. Version L includes thirteen, rather than fifteen, stories: the story told by the final sage, usually called Meron or Merons in the French, is absent, as is the prince's story, [[Vaticinium]]; this version does not include the stories [[Vidua]], [[Roma]], or [[Inclusa]]. In their place are two final stories - [[Noverca]] and [[Filia]] - which are found only in this version, and in Version S.		Version L is unusual for a few reasons. It is worth noting that althought Version L exactly follows Version A for the first 11 stories (through [[Sapientes]]), the two traditions diverge sharply from there on. Version L includes thirteen, rather than fifteen, stories: the story told by the final sage, usually called Meron or Merons in the French, is absent, as is the prince's story, [[Vaticinium]]; this version does not include the stories [[Vidua]], [[Roma]], or [[Inclusa]]. In their place are two final stories - [[Noverca]] and [[Filia]] - which are found only in this version, and in [[S (Scala Coeli)\|Version S]].

	While this pattern (fewer and different tales, in a distinct order) links the manuscripts below, there are also redactions of the ''Sept Sages'' that follow Version A's pattern, but include Noverca, Filia, or both. The presence of these texts, which seem so clearly linked to Version L's distinctive pattern, in texts that otherwise resemble Version A therefore serves as both evidence of the proximity of these two versions, and an argument for their cross-pollination. See the manuscripts filed under [[French A/L Overlap]] for more on this.		While this pattern (fewer and different tales, in a distinct order) links the manuscripts below, there are also redactions of the ''Sept Sages'' that follow Version A's pattern, but include Noverca, Filia, or both. The presence of these texts, which seem so clearly linked to Version L's distinctive pattern, in texts that otherwise resemble Version A therefore serves as both evidence of the proximity of these two versions, and an argument for their cross-pollination. See the manuscripts filed under [[French A/L Overlap]] for more on this.

Bonsall at 16:32, 4 February 2025

2025-02-04T16:32:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:32, 4 February 2025
Line 10:		Line 10:
	\|Is Adapted From=A (Seven Sages)		\|Is Adapted From=A (Seven Sages)
	\|Is Adapted Into=Overlap of Versions A and L; French Version L; Catalan Version L		\|Is Adapted Into=Overlap of Versions A and L; French Version L; Catalan Version L
	\|Has Source For Composition And Adaption Information=Runte (1974)		\|Has Source For Composition And Adaption Information=Runte (1974); Campbell (1907); Foehr-Janssens (1994)
	\|Has Original Language Of Version=Old French		\|Has Original Language Of Version=Old French
	\|Has Start Date Of Composition=1200		\|Has Start Date Of Composition=1200
	\|Has End Date Of Composition=1250		\|Has End Date Of Composition=1250
	\|Has Source For Date Of Text Composition=~~Foerh~~-Janssens (1994)		\|Has Source For Date Of Text Composition=Foehr-Janssens (1994)
	\|Has Text Language=Old French		\|Has Text Language=Old French
	\|Has Modern Research Literature=Berne-Aïache (1966); Berne-Aïache (1977); Brereton (1953); Coco (2016); Foehr-Janssens (1994); Gilleland (1981~~); Le Roux de Lincy (1838~~); Maulu (2016); Paris (1876); Roques (1983); Runte (1971); Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Speer (1981); Speer (1989)		\|Has Modern Research Literature=Berne-Aïache (1966); Berne-Aïache (1977); Brereton (1953); Coco (2016); Foehr-Janssens (1994); Gilleland (1981); Maulu (2016); Paris (1876); Roques (1983); Runte (1971); Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Speer (1981); Speer (1989); Le Roux de Lincy (1838)
			\|Has Modern Edition=Le Roux de Lincy, Roman des Sept Sages de Rome (1838)
	}}		}}
	{{EmbeddedStory		{{EmbeddedStory

Bonsall at 16:30, 4 February 2025

2025-02-04T16:30:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:30, 4 February 2025
Line 2:		Line 2:
	\|Has Description=Version L of the ''Roman des Sept Sages de Rome'', named for the early editor Le Roux de Lincy, is closely related to other ''Sept Sages'' versions, in particular [[A (Seven Sages)\|Version A]], and S (Scala Celi).		\|Has Description=Version L of the ''Roman des Sept Sages de Rome'', named for the early editor Le Roux de Lincy, is closely related to other ''Sept Sages'' versions, in particular [[A (Seven Sages)\|Version A]], and S (Scala Celi).

	Version L is unusual for a few reasons. It is worth noting that althought Version L exactly follows Version A for the first 11 stories (through [[Sapientes]]), the two traditions diverge sharply from there on. Version L includes thirteen, rather than fifteen, stories: the story told by the final sage, usually called Meron or Merons in the French, is absent, as is the prince's story, [[Vaticinium]]; this version does not include the stories [[Vidua]], [[Roma]], or [[Inclusa]]. In their place are two final stories - [[Noverca]] and [[Filia]] - which are ~~unique to~~ this version.		Version L is unusual for a few reasons. It is worth noting that althought Version L exactly follows Version A for the first 11 stories (through [[Sapientes]]), the two traditions diverge sharply from there on. Version L includes thirteen, rather than fifteen, stories: the story told by the final sage, usually called Meron or Merons in the French, is absent, as is the prince's story, [[Vaticinium]]; this version does not include the stories [[Vidua]], [[Roma]], or [[Inclusa]]. In their place are two final stories - [[Noverca]] and [[Filia]] - which are found only in this version, and in Version S.

	While this pattern (fewer and different tales, in a distinct order) links the manuscripts below, there are also redactions of the ''Sept Sages'' that follow Version A's pattern, but include Noverca, Filia, or both. The presence of these texts, which seem so clearly linked to Version L's distinctive pattern, in texts that otherwise resemble Version A therefore serves as both evidence of the proximity of these two versions, and an argument for their cross-pollination. See the manuscripts filed under [[French A/L Overlap]] for more on this.		While this pattern (fewer and different tales, in a distinct order) links the manuscripts below, there are also redactions of the ''Sept Sages'' that follow Version A's pattern, but include Noverca, Filia, or both. The presence of these texts, which seem so clearly linked to Version L's distinctive pattern, in texts that otherwise resemble Version A therefore serves as both evidence of the proximity of these two versions, and an argument for their cross-pollination. See the manuscripts filed under [[French A/L Overlap]] for more on this.

Bonsall at 16:28, 4 February 2025

2025-02-04T16:28:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:28, 4 February 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Version		{{Version
	\|Has ~~Title~~=Sept Sages de Rome		\|Has Description=Version L of the ''Roman des Sept Sages de Rome'', named for the early editor Le Roux de Lincy, is closely related to other ''Sept Sages'' versions, in particular [[A (Seven Sages)\|Version A]], and S (Scala Celi).

			Version L is unusual for a few reasons. It is worth noting that althought Version L exactly follows Version A for the first 11 stories (through [[Sapientes]]), the two traditions diverge sharply from there on. Version L includes thirteen, rather than fifteen, stories: the story told by the final sage, usually called Meron or Merons in the French, is absent, as is the prince's story, [[Vaticinium]]; this version does not include the stories [[Vidua]], [[Roma]], or [[Inclusa]]. In their place are two final stories - [[Noverca]] and [[Filia]] - which are unique to this version.

			While this pattern (fewer and different tales, in a distinct order) links the manuscripts below, there are also redactions of the ''Sept Sages'' that follow Version A's pattern, but include Noverca, Filia, or both. The presence of these texts, which seem so clearly linked to Version L's distinctive pattern, in texts that otherwise resemble Version A therefore serves as both evidence of the proximity of these two versions, and an argument for their cross-pollination. See the manuscripts filed under [[French A/L Overlap]] for more on this.
			\|Has Title=Roman des Sept Sages
	\|Has Siglum=L (Sept Sages de Rome)		\|Has Siglum=L (Sept Sages de Rome)
	\|Has Branch Of Tradition=West		\|Has Branch Of Tradition=West
	\|Is Adapted From=A (Seven Sages)		\|Is Adapted From=A (Seven Sages)
	\|Is Adapted Into=Overlap of Versions A and L		\|Is Adapted Into=Overlap of Versions A and L; French Version L; Catalan Version L
	\|Has Source For Composition And Adaption Information=Runte (1974)		\|Has Source For Composition And Adaption Information=Runte (1974)
	\|Has Original Language Of Version=Old French		\|Has Original Language Of Version=Old French
	\|Has Date Of ~~Text~~ Composition=1200-1250		\|Has Start Date Of Composition=1200
			\|Has End Date Of Composition=1250
	\|Has Source For Date Of Text Composition=Foerh-Janssens (1994)		\|Has Source For Date Of Text Composition=Foerh-Janssens (1994)
	\|Has Text Language=Old French		\|Has Text Language=Old French
	\|Has Modern Research Literature=Berne-Aïache (1966); Berne-Aïache (1977); Brereton (1953); Coco (2016); Foehr-Janssens (1994); Gilleland (1981); Le Roux de Lincy (1838); Maulu (2016); Paris (1876); Roques (1983); Runte (1971); Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Speer (1981); Speer (1989)		\|Has Modern Research Literature=Berne-Aïache (1966); Berne-Aïache (1977); Brereton (1953); Coco (2016); Foehr-Janssens (1994); Gilleland (1981); Le Roux de Lincy (1838); Maulu (2016); Paris (1876); Roques (1983); Runte (1971); Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Speer (1981); Speer (1989)
	\|Has Note=Version L is unusual for a few reasons. First, it is worth noting that there are 13, rather than 15, stories: the final sage, usually called Merons in the French, is absent, as is the prince's story. Additionally, the two final stories - ''[[Noverca]]'' and ''[[Filia]]'' - are unique to this version. Their presence in texts that otherwise resemble Version A texts therefore serves as both evidence of the proximity of these two versions, and an argument for their cross-pollination.
	}}		}}
	{{EmbeddedStory		{{EmbeddedStory
Line 22:		Line 27:
	\|Has Sequence Number=2		\|Has Sequence Number=2
	\|Has Narrator=Bancillas		\|Has Narrator=Bancillas
			\|Has Name Variation=Baucillas
	}}		}}
	{{EmbeddedStory		{{EmbeddedStory
Line 41:		Line 47:
	\|Has Short Title=Puteus		\|Has Short Title=Puteus
	\|Has Sequence Number=6		\|Has Sequence Number=6
	\|Has Narrator=Lantulles		\|Has Narrator=Lentulus
			\|Has Name Variation=Lantulles
	}}		}}
	{{EmbeddedStory		{{EmbeddedStory
Line 52:		Line 59:
	\|Has Sequence Number=8		\|Has Sequence Number=8
	\|Has Narrator=Malquidras		\|Has Narrator=Malquidras
			\|Has Name Variation=Malquidras li torz; Malquidarz
	}}		}}
	{{EmbeddedStory		{{EmbeddedStory
Line 62:		Line 70:
	\|Has Sequence Number=10		\|Has Sequence Number=10
	\|Has Narrator=Cato		\|Has Narrator=Cato
			\|Has Name Variation=Chatons de Rome
	}}		}}
	{{EmbeddedStory		{{EmbeddedStory

Noeth at 18:27, 19 August 2024

2024-08-19T18:27:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:27, 19 August 2024
Line 11:		Line 11:
	\|Has Text Language=Old French		\|Has Text Language=Old French
	\|Has Modern Research Literature=Berne-Aïache (1966); Berne-Aïache (1977); Brereton (1953); Coco (2016); Foehr-Janssens (1994); Gilleland (1981); Le Roux de Lincy (1838); Maulu (2016); Paris (1876); Roques (1983); Runte (1971); Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Speer (1981); Speer (1989)		\|Has Modern Research Literature=Berne-Aïache (1966); Berne-Aïache (1977); Brereton (1953); Coco (2016); Foehr-Janssens (1994); Gilleland (1981); Le Roux de Lincy (1838); Maulu (2016); Paris (1876); Roques (1983); Runte (1971); Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Speer (1981); Speer (1989)
			\|Has Note=Version L is unusual for a few reasons. First, it is worth noting that there are 13, rather than 15, stories: the final sage, usually called Merons in the French, is absent, as is the prince's story. Additionally, the two final stories - ''[[Noverca]]'' and ''[[Filia]]'' - are unique to this version. Their presence in texts that otherwise resemble Version A texts therefore serves as both evidence of the proximity of these two versions, and an argument for their cross-pollination.
	}}		}}
	{{EmbeddedStory		{{EmbeddedStory
Line 77:		Line 78:
	\|Has Narrator=Empress		\|Has Narrator=Empress
	}}		}}
	Version L is unusual for a few reasons. First, it is worth noting that there are 13, rather than 15, stories: the final sage, usually called Merons in the French, is absent, as is the prince's story. Additionally, the two final stories - ''[[Noverca]]'' and ''[[Filia]]'' - are unique to this version. Their presence in texts that otherwise resemble Version A texts therefore serves as both evidence of the proximity of these two versions, and an argument for their cross-pollination.