Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M) - Revision history

Noeth at 13:40, 18 February 2026

2026-02-18T13:40:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:40, 18 February 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:

	[[D'Agostino (2022)]] explores the complex relationship between the three 'ramo antico' redactions at length. Through close analysis of the textual variations across all manuscript witness of the three redactions, D'Agostino suggests that the Latin Versio Italica (or some specific manuscript witnesses of that version) may have been the source for the ''Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna'', as many scholars have suggested ([[Paris (1876)\|Paris (1876),]] [[Rajna (1880)]], etc.). However, D'Agostino does not concur with Gaston Paris' insistance that the Latin text was the source for [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] as well, instead suggesting that C and L both derived from a shared (lost) source, with intervening textual variation, cross-contamination, and mediation (p. 271-75).		[[D'Agostino (2022)]] explores the complex relationship between the three 'ramo antico' redactions at length. Through close analysis of the textual variations across all manuscript witness of the three redactions, D'Agostino suggests that the Latin Versio Italica (or some specific manuscript witnesses of that version) may have been the source for the ''Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna'', as many scholars have suggested ([[Paris (1876)\|Paris (1876),]] [[Rajna (1880)]], etc.). However, D'Agostino does not concur with Gaston Paris' insistance that the Latin text was the source for [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] as well, instead suggesting that C and L both derived from a shared (lost) source, with intervening textual variation, cross-contamination, and mediation (p. 271-75).
			\|Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome
	\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)		\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)
	~~\|Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome~~
	\|Is Adapted From=Versio Italica historiae septem sapientum (L)		\|Is Adapted From=Versio Italica historiae septem sapientum (L)
	\|Has Source For Composition And Adaption Information=D'Agostino (2022)		\|Has Source For Composition And Adaption Information=D'Agostino (2022)
Line 13:		Line 13:
	\|Has Start Date Of Composition=1350		\|Has Start Date Of Composition=1350
	\|Has End Date Of Composition=1450		\|Has End Date Of Composition=1450
	~~\|Has Text Language=Italian~~
	\|Has Modern Research Literature=Roediger (1883); Della Lucia (1832); D'Agostino (2022); Wikeley (1983); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Rajna (1880); Paris (1876); D'Ancona (1864); Cesari (1896); Segre (1959); Mussafia (1867); Bianchi (2014-2015); Lusiani (2019); Cappelli (1865)		\|Has Modern Research Literature=Roediger (1883); Della Lucia (1832); D'Agostino (2022); Wikeley (1983); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Rajna (1880); Paris (1876); D'Ancona (1864); Cesari (1896); Segre (1959); Mussafia (1867); Bianchi (2014-2015); Lusiani (2019); Cappelli (1865)
	\|Has Modern Edition=Roediger, Libro de' sette savi (1883); Della Lucia, Novella antica (1832); Lusiani, Il Libro dei sette savî di Roma (2019)		\|Has Modern Edition=Roediger, Libro de' sette savi (1883); Della Lucia, Novella antica (1832); Lusiani, Il Libro dei sette savî di Roma (2019)

Noeth: Text replacement - "Has Original Language Of Version" to "Has Language Of Version"

2026-01-27T11:22:11Z

Text replacement - "Has Original Language Of Version" to "Has Language Of Version"

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:22, 27 January 2026
Line 9:		Line 9:
	\|Is Adapted From=Versio Italica historiae septem sapientum (L)		\|Is Adapted From=Versio Italica historiae septem sapientum (L)
	\|Has Source For Composition And Adaption Information=D'Agostino (2022)		\|Has Source For Composition And Adaption Information=D'Agostino (2022)
	\|Has ~~Original~~ Language Of Version=Italian		\|Has Language Of Version=Italian
	\|Has Place Of Text Composition=Venice, Italy		\|Has Place Of Text Composition=Venice, Italy
	\|Has Start Date Of Composition=1350		\|Has Start Date Of Composition=1350

Noeth: Text replacement - "Has Branch Of Tradition=West" to "Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome"

2025-12-03T12:41:43Z

Text replacement - "Has Branch Of Tradition=West" to "Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome"

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:41, 3 December 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:
	[[D'Agostino (2022)]] explores the complex relationship between the three 'ramo antico' redactions at length. Through close analysis of the textual variations across all manuscript witness of the three redactions, D'Agostino suggests that the Latin Versio Italica (or some specific manuscript witnesses of that version) may have been the source for the ''Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna'', as many scholars have suggested ([[Paris (1876)\|Paris (1876),]] [[Rajna (1880)]], etc.). However, D'Agostino does not concur with Gaston Paris' insistance that the Latin text was the source for [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] as well, instead suggesting that C and L both derived from a shared (lost) source, with intervening textual variation, cross-contamination, and mediation (p. 271-75).		[[D'Agostino (2022)]] explores the complex relationship between the three 'ramo antico' redactions at length. Through close analysis of the textual variations across all manuscript witness of the three redactions, D'Agostino suggests that the Latin Versio Italica (or some specific manuscript witnesses of that version) may have been the source for the ''Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna'', as many scholars have suggested ([[Paris (1876)\|Paris (1876),]] [[Rajna (1880)]], etc.). However, D'Agostino does not concur with Gaston Paris' insistance that the Latin text was the source for [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] as well, instead suggesting that C and L both derived from a shared (lost) source, with intervening textual variation, cross-contamination, and mediation (p. 271-75).
	\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)		\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)
	\|Has Branch Of Tradition=~~West~~		\|Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome
	\|Is Adapted From=Versio Italica historiae septem sapientum (L)		\|Is Adapted From=Versio Italica historiae septem sapientum (L)
	\|Has Source For Composition And Adaption Information=D'Agostino (2022)		\|Has Source For Composition And Adaption Information=D'Agostino (2022)

Bonsall at 12:11, 18 November 2025

2025-11-18T12:11:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:11, 18 November 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:
	\|Has End Date Of Composition=1450		\|Has End Date Of Composition=1450
	\|Has Text Language=Italian		\|Has Text Language=Italian
	\|Has Modern Research Literature=Roediger (1883); Della Lucia (1832); D'Agostino (2022); Wikeley (1983); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Rajna (1880); Paris (1876); D'Ancona (1864); Cesari (1896); Segre (1959); Mussafia (1867~~); Capelli (1865~~); Bianchi (2014-2015); Lusiani (2019)		\|Has Modern Research Literature=Roediger (1883); Della Lucia (1832); D'Agostino (2022); Wikeley (1983); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Rajna (1880); Paris (1876); D'Ancona (1864); Cesari (1896); Segre (1959); Mussafia (1867); Bianchi (2014-2015); Lusiani (2019); Cappelli (1865)
	\|Has Modern Edition=Roediger, Libro de' sette savi (1883); Della Lucia, Novella antica (1832); Lusiani, Il Libro dei sette savî di Roma (2019)		\|Has Modern Edition=Roediger, Libro de' sette savi (1883); Della Lucia, Novella antica (1832); Lusiani, Il Libro dei sette savî di Roma (2019)
	\|Has Note=Also known as Novella antica, Scritta nel buon secolo della lingua and Libro de' sette savi di Roma.		\|Has Note=Also known as Novella antica, Scritta nel buon secolo della lingua and Libro de' sette savi di Roma.

Bonsall at 16:20, 17 November 2025

2025-11-17T16:20:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:20, 17 November 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:
	\|Has End Date Of Composition=1450		\|Has End Date Of Composition=1450
	\|Has Text Language=Italian		\|Has Text Language=Italian
	\|Has Modern Research Literature=Roediger (1883); Della Lucia (1832~~); Lusiani (2018-2019~~); D'Agostino (2022); Wikeley (1983); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Rajna (1880); Paris (1876); D'Ancona (1864); Cesari (1896); Segre (1959); Mussafia (1867); Capelli (1865); Bianchi (2014-2015)		\|Has Modern Research Literature=Roediger (1883); Della Lucia (1832); D'Agostino (2022); Wikeley (1983); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Rajna (1880); Paris (1876); D'Ancona (1864); Cesari (1896); Segre (1959); Mussafia (1867); Capelli (1865); Bianchi (2014-2015); Lusiani (2019)
	\|Has Modern Edition=Roediger, Libro de' sette savi (1883); Della Lucia, Novella antica (1832); Lusiani, Il Libro dei sette savî di Roma (~~2018-~~2019)		\|Has Modern Edition=Roediger, Libro de' sette savi (1883); Della Lucia, Novella antica (1832); Lusiani, Il Libro dei sette savî di Roma (2019)
	\|Has Note=Also known as Novella antica, Scritta nel buon secolo della lingua and Libro de' sette savi di Roma.		\|Has Note=Also known as Novella antica, Scritta nel buon secolo della lingua and Libro de' sette savi di Roma.
	\|Has Note On The Frame=According to [[Wikeley (1983)]], the prince is called Stefano.		\|Has Note On The Frame=According to [[Wikeley (1983)]], the prince is called Stefano.

Bonsall at 15:05, 17 November 2025

2025-11-17T15:05:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:05, 17 November 2025
Line 11:		Line 11:
	\|Has Original Language Of Version=Italian		\|Has Original Language Of Version=Italian
	\|Has Place Of Text Composition=Venice, Italy		\|Has Place Of Text Composition=Venice, Italy
	\|Has Start Date Of Composition=~~1300~~		\|Has Start Date Of Composition=1350
	\|Has End Date Of Composition=~~1500~~		\|Has End Date Of Composition=1450
	\|Has Text Language=Italian		\|Has Text Language=Italian
	\|Has Modern Research Literature=Roediger (1883); Della Lucia (1832); Lusiani (2018-2019); D'Agostino (2022); Wikeley (1983); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Rajna (1880); Paris (1876); D'Ancona (1864); Cesari (1896); Segre (1959); Mussafia (1867); Capelli (1865); Bianchi (2014-2015)		\|Has Modern Research Literature=Roediger (1883); Della Lucia (1832); Lusiani (2018-2019); D'Agostino (2022); Wikeley (1983); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Rajna (1880); Paris (1876); D'Ancona (1864); Cesari (1896); Segre (1959); Mussafia (1867); Capelli (1865); Bianchi (2014-2015)

Bonsall at 14:59, 17 November 2025

2025-11-17T14:59:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:59, 17 November 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:
	[[D'Agostino (2022)]] explores the complex relationship between the three 'ramo antico' redactions at length. Through close analysis of the textual variations across all manuscript witness of the three redactions, D'Agostino suggests that the Latin Versio Italica (or some specific manuscript witnesses of that version) may have been the source for the ''Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna'', as many scholars have suggested ([[Paris (1876)\|Paris (1876),]] [[Rajna (1880)]], etc.). However, D'Agostino does not concur with Gaston Paris' insistance that the Latin text was the source for [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] as well, instead suggesting that C and L both derived from a shared (lost) source, with intervening textual variation, cross-contamination, and mediation (p. 271-75).		[[D'Agostino (2022)]] explores the complex relationship between the three 'ramo antico' redactions at length. Through close analysis of the textual variations across all manuscript witness of the three redactions, D'Agostino suggests that the Latin Versio Italica (or some specific manuscript witnesses of that version) may have been the source for the ''Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna'', as many scholars have suggested ([[Paris (1876)\|Paris (1876),]] [[Rajna (1880)]], etc.). However, D'Agostino does not concur with Gaston Paris' insistance that the Latin text was the source for [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] as well, instead suggesting that C and L both derived from a shared (lost) source, with intervening textual variation, cross-contamination, and mediation (p. 271-75).
	\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)		\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)
	\|Has Modern Research Literature=Roediger (1883); Della Lucia (1832); Lusiani (2018-2019); D'Agostino (2022); Wikeley (1983); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Rajna (1880); Paris (1876); D'Ancona (1864); Cesari (1896)		\|Has Branch Of Tradition=West
			\|Is Adapted From=Versio Italica historiae septem sapientum (L)
			\|Has Source For Composition And Adaption Information=D'Agostino (2022)
			\|Has Original Language Of Version=Italian
			\|Has Place Of Text Composition=Venice, Italy
			\|Has Start Date Of Composition=1300
			\|Has End Date Of Composition=1500
			\|Has Text Language=Italian
			\|Has Modern Research Literature=Roediger (1883); Della Lucia (1832); Lusiani (2018-2019); D'Agostino (2022); Wikeley (1983); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Rajna (1880); Paris (1876); D'Ancona (1864); Cesari (1896); Segre (1959); Mussafia (1867); Capelli (1865); Bianchi (2014-2015)
	\|Has Modern Edition=Roediger, Libro de' sette savi (1883); Della Lucia, Novella antica (1832); Lusiani, Il Libro dei sette savî di Roma (2018-2019)		\|Has Modern Edition=Roediger, Libro de' sette savi (1883); Della Lucia, Novella antica (1832); Lusiani, Il Libro dei sette savî di Roma (2018-2019)
	\|Has Note=Also known as Novella antica, Scritta nel buon secolo della lingua and Libro de' sette savi di Roma.		\|Has Note=Also known as Novella antica, Scritta nel buon secolo della lingua and Libro de' sette savi di Roma.

Bonsall at 14:56, 17 November 2025

2025-11-17T14:56:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:56, 17 November 2025
Line 2:		Line 2:
	\|Has Description=The Version I text ''Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna'' has often been given the siglum M (for 'Matrigna') in scholarship. There was some controversy about its original reception: it was first published by [[Della Lucia (1832)\|Giovanni Della Lucia in Venice, 1832]], under the title ''Novella antica scritta nel buon secolo della lingua''; it was then reprinted by Gaetano Romagnoli in 1862. Apparently Della Lucia had taken 'some liberties' with the text, 'Tuscanizing' the prose of a Venetian manuscript, which prompted sustained debate about the authenticity of the text as a medieval narrative (see [[Wikeley (1983)]] and [[D'Agostino (2022)]]). This was laid to rest when the fifteenth-century manuscript was rediscovered and edited in [[Roediger (1883)\|1883 by Franz Roediger]].		\|Has Description=The Version I text ''Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna'' has often been given the siglum M (for 'Matrigna') in scholarship. There was some controversy about its original reception: it was first published by [[Della Lucia (1832)\|Giovanni Della Lucia in Venice, 1832]], under the title ''Novella antica scritta nel buon secolo della lingua''; it was then reprinted by Gaetano Romagnoli in 1862. Apparently Della Lucia had taken 'some liberties' with the text, 'Tuscanizing' the prose of a Venetian manuscript, which prompted sustained debate about the authenticity of the text as a medieval narrative (see [[Wikeley (1983)]] and [[D'Agostino (2022)]]). This was laid to rest when the fifteenth-century manuscript was rediscovered and edited in [[Roediger (1883)\|1883 by Franz Roediger]].

	''Crudele Matrigna'' is one of the three texts that forms the 'ramo italico antico', the old branch of the Italian ''Seven Sages'' texts, alongside the [[Versio Italica historiae septem sapientum (L)]], and		''Crudele Matrigna'' is one of the three texts that forms the 'ramo italico antico', the old branch of the Italian ''Seven Sages'' texts, alongside the Latin [[Versio Italica historiae septem sapientum (L)]], and Italian [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]]. Like both of these redactions, ''Crudele Matrigna'' has fourteen, rather than the expected fifteen, stories. The storytelling contest begins with the sages' first story, [[Canis]], rather than a story told by the empress; her story [[Senescalcus]] is omitted entirely, and she tells six rather than seven stories. Some scholarship ([[Rajna (1880)\|Rajna]]) suggests this omission may have been made out of prudishness (as Senescalcus is the most explicit of the tales usually found in the [[A (Seven Sages)\|Version A]] pattern); whatever the reason, the change necessitated a reordering of the narrative components of the text (see story order, below).

			[[D'Agostino (2022)]] explores the complex relationship between the three 'ramo antico' redactions at length. Through close analysis of the textual variations across all manuscript witness of the three redactions, D'Agostino suggests that the Latin Versio Italica (or some specific manuscript witnesses of that version) may have been the source for the ''Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna'', as many scholars have suggested ([[Paris (1876)\|Paris (1876),]] [[Rajna (1880)]], etc.). However, D'Agostino does not concur with Gaston Paris' insistance that the Latin text was the source for [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] as well, instead suggesting that C and L both derived from a shared (lost) source, with intervening textual variation, cross-contamination, and mediation (p. 271-75).
	\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)		\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)
	\|Has Modern Research Literature=Roediger (1883); Della Lucia (1832)		\|Has Modern Research Literature=Roediger (1883); Della Lucia (1832); Lusiani (2018-2019); D'Agostino (2022); Wikeley (1983); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Rajna (1880); Paris (1876); D'Ancona (1864); Cesari (1896)
	\|Has Modern Edition=Roediger, Libro de' sette savi (1883); Della Lucia, Novella antica (1832)		\|Has Modern Edition=Roediger, Libro de' sette savi (1883); Della Lucia, Novella antica (1832); Lusiani, Il Libro dei sette savî di Roma (2018-2019)
	\|Has Note=Also known as Novella antica, Scritta nel buon secolo della lingua and Libro de' sette savi di Roma.		\|Has Note=Also known as Novella antica, Scritta nel buon secolo della lingua and Libro de' sette savi di Roma.
	\|Has Note On The Frame=According to [[Wikeley (1983)]], the prince is called Stefano.		\|Has Note On The Frame=According to [[Wikeley (1983)]], the prince is called Stefano.

Bonsall at 14:46, 17 November 2025

2025-11-17T14:46:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:46, 17 November 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Version		{{Version
			\|Has Description=The Version I text ''Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna'' has often been given the siglum M (for 'Matrigna') in scholarship. There was some controversy about its original reception: it was first published by [[Della Lucia (1832)\|Giovanni Della Lucia in Venice, 1832]], under the title ''Novella antica scritta nel buon secolo della lingua''; it was then reprinted by Gaetano Romagnoli in 1862. Apparently Della Lucia had taken 'some liberties' with the text, 'Tuscanizing' the prose of a Venetian manuscript, which prompted sustained debate about the authenticity of the text as a medieval narrative (see [[Wikeley (1983)]] and [[D'Agostino (2022)]]). This was laid to rest when the fifteenth-century manuscript was rediscovered and edited in [[Roediger (1883)\|1883 by Franz Roediger]].

			''Crudele Matrigna'' is one of the three texts that forms the 'ramo italico antico', the old branch of the Italian ''Seven Sages'' texts, alongside the [[Versio Italica historiae septem sapientum (L)]], and
	\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)		\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)
	\|Has Modern Research Literature=Roediger (1883); Della Lucia (1832)		\|Has Modern Research Literature=Roediger (1883); Della Lucia (1832)

Bonsall: Bonsall moved page Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna to Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M)

2025-11-17T12:29:29Z

Bonsall moved page Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna to Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M)

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:29, 17 November 2025
(No difference)