Versio Italica historiae septem sapientum (L) - Revision history

Noeth at 13:41, 18 February 2026

2026-02-18T13:41:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:41, 18 February 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:

	[[D'Agostino (2022)]] explores the complex relationship between this redaction and the Italian [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)\|C]] and [[Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M)\|M]] redactions at length. Through close analysis of the textual variations across all manuscript witness of the three redactions, D'Agostino suggests that the Latin Versio Italica (or some specific manuscript witnesses of that version) may have been the source for the Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M), as many scholars have suggested ([[Paris (1876)\|Paris (1876),]] [[Rajna (1880)]], etc.). However, D'Agostino does not concur with Gaston Paris' insistance that the Latin text was the source for [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] as well, instead suggesting that C and L both derived from a shared (lost) source, with intervening textual variation, cross-contamination, and mediation (p. 271-75).		[[D'Agostino (2022)]] explores the complex relationship between this redaction and the Italian [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)\|C]] and [[Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M)\|M]] redactions at length. Through close analysis of the textual variations across all manuscript witness of the three redactions, D'Agostino suggests that the Latin Versio Italica (or some specific manuscript witnesses of that version) may have been the source for the Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M), as many scholars have suggested ([[Paris (1876)\|Paris (1876),]] [[Rajna (1880)]], etc.). However, D'Agostino does not concur with Gaston Paris' insistance that the Latin text was the source for [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] as well, instead suggesting that C and L both derived from a shared (lost) source, with intervening textual variation, cross-contamination, and mediation (p. 271-75).
			\|Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome
	\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)		\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)
	\|Has ~~Branch~~ Of ~~Tradition~~=~~Seven Sages of Rome~~		\|Has Language Of Version=Latin
	\|Has Place Of Text Composition=Italy		\|Has Place Of Text Composition=Italy
	\|Has Start Date Of Composition=1350		\|Has Start Date Of Composition=1350
	\|Has End Date Of Composition=1425		\|Has End Date Of Composition=1425
	~~\|Has Text Language=Latin~~
	\|Has Modern Research Literature=Fischer (1902); Campbell (1907); Murko (1890); Mussafia (1867); D'Agostino (2022); D'Ancona (1864); Bianchi (2014-2015); Rajna (1880)		\|Has Modern Research Literature=Fischer (1902); Campbell (1907); Murko (1890); Mussafia (1867); D'Agostino (2022); D'Ancona (1864); Bianchi (2014-2015); Rajna (1880)
	\|Has Modern Edition=Fischer, Beiträge zur Litteratur der Sieben weisen Meister (1902); Mussafia, Beiträge zur Litteratur der Sieben weisen Meister (1867); D'Agostino, Liber septem philosophorum (2024)		\|Has Modern Edition=Fischer, Beiträge zur Litteratur der Sieben weisen Meister (1902); Mussafia, Beiträge zur Litteratur der Sieben weisen Meister (1867); D'Agostino, Liber septem philosophorum (2024)

Bonsall at 11:00, 8 December 2025

2025-12-08T11:00:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:00, 8 December 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Version		{{Version
	\|Has Description=The Latin iteration of the Italian [[I (Versio Italico)\|Version I]] pattern, usually referred to in scholarship as 'L' (in reference to its language), presumably derived from a lost text of [[I (Versio Italico)\|Version I,]] which in turn distantly derived from a [[French Version A: Roman des Sept Sages\|French Version A]].		\|Has Description=The fifteenth-century Latin iteration of the Italian [[I (Versio Italico)\|Version I]] pattern, usually referred to in scholarship as 'L' (in reference to its language), presumably derived from a lost text of [[I (Versio Italico)\|Version I,]] which in turn distantly derived from a [[French Version A: Roman des Sept Sages\|French Version A]].

	The Versio Italica (L) is one of the three 'antique' branches of the Version I pattern, along with [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] and [[Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M)]] (the 'ramo italico antico'). Like both of these Italian redactions, the Latin Versio Italica (L) has fourteen, rather than the expected fifteen stories. The storytelling contest begins with the sages' first story, [[Canis]], rather than a story told by the empress; her story [[Senescalcus]] is omitted entirely, and she tells six rather than seven stories. Some scholarship ([[Rajna (1880)\|Rajna]]) suggests this omission may have been made out of prudishness (as Senescalcus is the most explicit of the tales usually found in the [[A (Seven Sages)\|Version A]] pattern); whatever the reason, the change necessitated a reordering of the narrative components of the text (see story order, below).		The Versio Italica (L) is one of the three 'antique' branches of the Version I pattern, along with [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] and [[Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M)]] (the 'ramo italico antico'). Like both of these Italian redactions, the Latin Versio Italica (L) has fourteen, rather than the expected fifteen stories. The storytelling contest begins with the sages' first story, [[Canis]], rather than a story told by the empress; her story [[Senescalcus]] is omitted entirely, and she tells six rather than seven stories. Some scholarship ([[Rajna (1880)\|Rajna]]) suggests this omission may have been made out of prudishness (as Senescalcus is the most explicit of the tales usually found in the [[A (Seven Sages)\|Version A]] pattern); whatever the reason, the change necessitated a reordering of the narrative components of the text (see story order, below).

Noeth: Text replacement - "Has Branch Of Tradition=West" to "Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome"

2025-12-03T12:41:40Z

Text replacement - "Has Branch Of Tradition=West" to "Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome"

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:41, 3 December 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:
	[[D'Agostino (2022)]] explores the complex relationship between this redaction and the Italian [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)\|C]] and [[Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M)\|M]] redactions at length. Through close analysis of the textual variations across all manuscript witness of the three redactions, D'Agostino suggests that the Latin Versio Italica (or some specific manuscript witnesses of that version) may have been the source for the Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M), as many scholars have suggested ([[Paris (1876)\|Paris (1876),]] [[Rajna (1880)]], etc.). However, D'Agostino does not concur with Gaston Paris' insistance that the Latin text was the source for [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] as well, instead suggesting that C and L both derived from a shared (lost) source, with intervening textual variation, cross-contamination, and mediation (p. 271-75).		[[D'Agostino (2022)]] explores the complex relationship between this redaction and the Italian [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)\|C]] and [[Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M)\|M]] redactions at length. Through close analysis of the textual variations across all manuscript witness of the three redactions, D'Agostino suggests that the Latin Versio Italica (or some specific manuscript witnesses of that version) may have been the source for the Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M), as many scholars have suggested ([[Paris (1876)\|Paris (1876),]] [[Rajna (1880)]], etc.). However, D'Agostino does not concur with Gaston Paris' insistance that the Latin text was the source for [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] as well, instead suggesting that C and L both derived from a shared (lost) source, with intervening textual variation, cross-contamination, and mediation (p. 271-75).
	\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)		\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)
	\|Has Branch Of Tradition=~~West~~		\|Has Branch Of Tradition=Seven Sages of Rome
	\|Has Place Of Text Composition=Italy		\|Has Place Of Text Composition=Italy
	\|Has Start Date Of Composition=1350		\|Has Start Date Of Composition=1350

Bonsall at 13:43, 21 November 2025

2025-11-21T13:43:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:43, 21 November 2025
Line 17:		Line 17:
	\|Has Short Title=Canis		\|Has Short Title=Canis
	\|Has Sequence Number=1		\|Has Sequence Number=1
			\|Has Narrator=First Master
	}}		}}
	{{EmbeddedStory		{{EmbeddedStory
Line 26:		Line 27:
	\|Has Short Title=Medicus		\|Has Short Title=Medicus
	\|Has Sequence Number=3		\|Has Sequence Number=3
			\|Has Narrator=Second Master
	}}		}}
	{{EmbeddedStory		{{EmbeddedStory
Line 35:		Line 37:
	\|Has Short Title=Tentamina		\|Has Short Title=Tentamina
	\|Has Sequence Number=5		\|Has Sequence Number=5
			\|Has Narrator=Third Master
	}}		}}
	{{EmbeddedStory		{{EmbeddedStory
Line 44:		Line 47:
	\|Has Short Title=Avis		\|Has Short Title=Avis
	\|Has Sequence Number=7		\|Has Sequence Number=7
			\|Has Narrator=Fourth Master
	}}		}}
	{{EmbeddedStory		{{EmbeddedStory
Line 53:		Line 57:
	\|Has Short Title=Inclusa		\|Has Short Title=Inclusa
	\|Has Sequence Number=9		\|Has Sequence Number=9
			\|Has Narrator=Fifth Master
	}}		}}
	{{EmbeddedStory		{{EmbeddedStory
Line 62:		Line 67:
	\|Has Short Title=Vidua		\|Has Short Title=Vidua
	\|Has Sequence Number=11		\|Has Sequence Number=11
			\|Has Narrator=Sixth Master
	}}		}}
	{{EmbeddedStory		{{EmbeddedStory
Line 71:		Line 77:
	\|Has Short Title=Puteus		\|Has Short Title=Puteus
	\|Has Sequence Number=13		\|Has Sequence Number=13
			\|Has Narrator=Seventh Master
	}}		}}
	{{EmbeddedStory		{{EmbeddedStory

Bonsall at 13:41, 21 November 2025

2025-11-21T13:41:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:41, 21 November 2025
Line 12:		Line 12:
	\|Has Text Language=Latin		\|Has Text Language=Latin
	\|Has Modern Research Literature=Fischer (1902); Campbell (1907); Murko (1890); Mussafia (1867); D'Agostino (2022); D'Ancona (1864); Bianchi (2014-2015); Rajna (1880)		\|Has Modern Research Literature=Fischer (1902); Campbell (1907); Murko (1890); Mussafia (1867); D'Agostino (2022); D'Ancona (1864); Bianchi (2014-2015); Rajna (1880)
	\|Has Modern Edition=Fischer, Beiträge zur Litteratur der Sieben weisen Meister (1902); Mussafia, Beiträge zur Litteratur der Sieben weisen Meister (1867)		\|Has Modern Edition=Fischer, Beiträge zur Litteratur der Sieben weisen Meister (1902); Mussafia, Beiträge zur Litteratur der Sieben weisen Meister (1867); D'Agostino, Liber septem philosophorum (2024)
	}}		}}
	{{EmbeddedStory		{{EmbeddedStory

Bonsall at 14:50, 17 November 2025

2025-11-17T14:50:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:50, 17 November 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:
	The Versio Italica (L) is one of the three 'antique' branches of the Version I pattern, along with [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] and [[Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M)]] (the 'ramo italico antico'). Like both of these Italian redactions, the Latin Versio Italica (L) has fourteen, rather than the expected fifteen stories. The storytelling contest begins with the sages' first story, [[Canis]], rather than a story told by the empress; her story [[Senescalcus]] is omitted entirely, and she tells six rather than seven stories. Some scholarship ([[Rajna (1880)\|Rajna]]) suggests this omission may have been made out of prudishness (as Senescalcus is the most explicit of the tales usually found in the [[A (Seven Sages)\|Version A]] pattern); whatever the reason, the change necessitated a reordering of the narrative components of the text (see story order, below).		The Versio Italica (L) is one of the three 'antique' branches of the Version I pattern, along with [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] and [[Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M)]] (the 'ramo italico antico'). Like both of these Italian redactions, the Latin Versio Italica (L) has fourteen, rather than the expected fifteen stories. The storytelling contest begins with the sages' first story, [[Canis]], rather than a story told by the empress; her story [[Senescalcus]] is omitted entirely, and she tells six rather than seven stories. Some scholarship ([[Rajna (1880)\|Rajna]]) suggests this omission may have been made out of prudishness (as Senescalcus is the most explicit of the tales usually found in the [[A (Seven Sages)\|Version A]] pattern); whatever the reason, the change necessitated a reordering of the narrative components of the text (see story order, below).

	[[D'Agostino (2022)]] explores the complex relationship between this redaction and the Italian [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)\|C]] and [[Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M)\|M]] redactions at length. Through close analysis of the textual variations across all manuscript witness of the three redactions, D'Agostino suggests that the Latin Versio Italica (or some specific manuscript witnesses of that version) may have been the source for the Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M), as many scholars have suggested ([[Paris (1876)\|Paris (1876),]] [[Rajna (1880)]], etc.). However, D'Agostino does not concur with Gaston Paris' insistance that the Latin text was the source for [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] as well, instead suggesting that C and L both derived from a shared (lost) source, with intervening textual variation, cross-contamination, and mediation (p. 271-75).		[[D'Agostino (2022)]] explores the complex relationship between this redaction and the Italian [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)\|C]] and [[Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M)\|M]] redactions at length. Through close analysis of the textual variations across all manuscript witness of the three redactions, D'Agostino suggests that the Latin Versio Italica (or some specific manuscript witnesses of that version) may have been the source for the Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M), as many scholars have suggested ([[Paris (1876)\|Paris (1876),]] [[Rajna (1880)]], etc.). However, D'Agostino does not concur with Gaston Paris' insistance that the Latin text was the source for [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] as well, instead suggesting that C and L both derived from a shared (lost) source, with intervening textual variation, cross-contamination, and mediation (p. 271-75).
	\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)		\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)
	\|Has Branch Of Tradition=West		\|Has Branch Of Tradition=West

Bonsall at 13:01, 17 November 2025

2025-11-17T13:01:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:01, 17 November 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Version		{{Version
	\|Has Description=The Latin iteration of the Italian [[I (Versio Italico)\|Version I]] pattern, usually referred to in scholarship as 'L', presumably derived from a lost ~~version~~ of ~~Latin~~ Version I, ~~with~~ a French Version A ~~text as a distant, orginal source~~.		\|Has Description=The Latin iteration of the Italian [[I (Versio Italico)\|Version I]] pattern, usually referred to in scholarship as 'L' (in reference to its language), presumably derived from a lost text of [[I (Versio Italico)\|Version I,]] which in turn distantly derived from a [[French Version A: Roman des Sept Sages\|French Version A]].

	Versio Italica (L) is one of the three 'antique' branches of the Version I pattern, along with		The Versio Italica (L) is one of the three 'antique' branches of the Version I pattern, along with [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] and [[Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M)]] (the 'ramo italico antico'). Like both of these Italian redactions, the Latin Versio Italica (L) has fourteen, rather than the expected fifteen stories. The storytelling contest begins with the sages' first story, [[Canis]], rather than a story told by the empress; her story [[Senescalcus]] is omitted entirely, and she tells six rather than seven stories. Some scholarship ([[Rajna (1880)\|Rajna]]) suggests this omission may have been made out of prudishness (as Senescalcus is the most explicit of the tales usually found in the [[A (Seven Sages)\|Version A]] pattern); whatever the reason, the change necessitated a reordering of the narrative components of the text (see story order, below).

	and the and ~~is one~~ of the ~~oldest~~.		[[D'Agostino (2022)]] explores the complex relationship between this redaction and the Italian [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)\|C]] and [[Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M)\|M]] redactions at length. Through close analysis of the textual variations across all manuscript witness of the three redactions, D'Agostino suggests that the Latin Versio Italica (or some specific manuscript witnesses of that version) may have been the source for the Storia d'una Crudele Matrigna (M), as many scholars have suggested ([[Paris (1876)\|Paris (1876),]] [[Rajna (1880)]], etc.). However, D'Agostino does not concur with Gaston Paris' insistance that the Latin text was the source for [[Il Libro dei Sette Savi de Roma (C)]] as well, instead suggesting that C and L both derived from a shared (lost) source, with intervening textual variation, cross-contamination, and mediation (p. 271-75).
	\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)		\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)
			\|Has Branch Of Tradition=West
			\|Has Place Of Text Composition=Italy
			\|Has Start Date Of Composition=1350
			\|Has End Date Of Composition=1425
	\|Has Text Language=Latin		\|Has Text Language=Latin
	\|Has Modern Research Literature=Fischer (1902); Campbell (1907); Murko (1890); Mussafia (1867); D'Agostino (2022); D'Ancona (1864); Bianchi (2014-2015)		\|Has Modern Research Literature=Fischer (1902); Campbell (1907); Murko (1890); Mussafia (1867); D'Agostino (2022); D'Ancona (1864); Bianchi (2014-2015); Rajna (1880)
	\|Has Modern Edition=Fischer, Beiträge zur Litteratur der Sieben weisen Meister (1902)		\|Has Modern Edition=Fischer, Beiträge zur Litteratur der Sieben weisen Meister (1902); Mussafia, Beiträge zur Litteratur der Sieben weisen Meister (1867)
	}}		}}
	{{EmbeddedStory		{{EmbeddedStory

Bonsall at 10:47, 17 November 2025

2025-11-17T10:47:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:47, 17 November 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Version		{{Version
	\|Has Description=The Latin iteration of the Italian [[I (Versio Italico)\|Version I]] pattern, usually referred to in scholarship as 'L', presumably derived from a lost version of Latin Version I, with a French Version A text as a distant source.		\|Has Description=The Latin iteration of the Italian [[I (Versio Italico)\|Version I]] pattern, usually referred to in scholarship as 'L', presumably derived from a lost version of Latin Version I, with a French Version A text as a distant, orginal source.

			Versio Italica (L) is one of the three 'antique' branches of the Version I pattern, along with

			and the and is one of the oldest.
	\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)		\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)
	\|Has Text Language=Latin		\|Has Text Language=Latin

Bonsall at 14:09, 16 November 2025

2025-11-16T14:09:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:09, 16 November 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Version		{{Version
			\|Has Description=The Latin iteration of the Italian [[I (Versio Italico)\|Version I]] pattern, usually referred to in scholarship as 'L', presumably derived from a lost version of Latin Version I, with a French Version A text as a distant source.
	\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)		\|Has Parent Version=I (Versio Italico)
	\|Has Modern Research Literature=Fischer (1902); Campbell (1907); Murko (1890); Mussafia (1867)		\|Has Text Language=Latin
			\|Has Modern Research Literature=Fischer (1902); Campbell (1907); Murko (1890); Mussafia (1867); D'Agostino (2022); D'Ancona (1864); Bianchi (2014-2015)
			\|Has Modern Edition=Fischer, Beiträge zur Litteratur der Sieben weisen Meister (1902)
	}}		}}
	{{EmbeddedStory		{{EmbeddedStory

Bonsall: Bonsall moved page Versio Italica (Latin) to Versio Italica historiae septem sapientum (L)

2025-11-16T13:46:04Z

Bonsall moved page Versio Italica (Latin) to Versio Italica historiae septem sapientum (L)

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:46, 16 November 2025
(No difference)