Bibliothèque nationale de France, français 189

From Seven Sages of Rome

Manuscript
Reference Number Fr36
Location Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France
Siglum/Shelfmark Français 189 (formerly Regius 6849)
Page/Folio range 298vb-335rb
Standardised title of narrative Sept Sages de Rome
Incipit or textual title A Romme eut jadis ung empereur qui eut a nom Deocliteus. Il avoit femme, de laquele lui demoura un hoir
Version (siglum) L (Sept Sages de Rome)
Language Group within Version French Version L
Narrative/Scholarly Group within Version
Further scholarly subgroup (1)
Further scholarly subgroup (2)
Translated/adapted from (Version/Text)
Source for information on textual relationship to broader tradition Foehr-Janssens (1994)
Scribe
Author
Place of Manuscript Production
Date of Manuscript Production 1470 - 1480
Source of date Manuscript Production BNF Catalogue: https://archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cc125648s
Material Parchment
Language of Manuscript Old French
Regional or specific Language of Manuscript
Source for regional or specific Language of Manuscript
Prose or Verse Prose
Other texts in the Manuscript 1ra-298rb: Le livre des merveilles, Ramon Llull

298vb-335rb: Le rommant des VII sages de Romme, version L

Script style/form
Total pages/folios in Manuscript 358 (?)
Height 384
Width 282
Illustrations Yes
Digitisation http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10467097w
Modern Editions Le Roux de Lincy, Roman des Sept Sages de Rome (1838)
Catalogue Catalogue des manuscrits français, t. I: Ancien fonds, Paris, Firmin Didot, 1868, p. 15 (n° 189).https://archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cc125648s
Modern Research Literature Arlima: https://arlima.net/no/3182JONAS: http://jonas.irht.cnrs.fr/manuscrit/77929Paris (1876)Le Roux de Lincy (1838)Runte (1989)Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014)Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984)Foehr-Janssens (1994)Speer (1981)Speer (1989)Gilleland (1981)Roques (1983)Maulu (2016)Brereton (1953)Berne-Aïache (1966)Berne-Aïache (1977)

Note

Note on foliation: there is some discrepancy between the BNF catalogue, and external sites and scholarship (Arlima, JONAS, etc.). However, the BNF's statement of foliation also does not correspond with the foliation of their digitised version of the manuscript (which I have used to supply the folio range at the top of the page); therefore folio numbers should be taken under caution and double checked.