L (Sept Sages de Rome): Difference between revisions
From Seven Sages of Rome
(Created page with "{{Version |Has Title=Sept Sages de Rome |Has Siglum=L (Sept Sages de Rome) |Has Branch Of Tradition=West |Has Original Language Of Version=Old French |Has Text Language=Old Fr...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Has Branch Of Tradition=West | |Has Branch Of Tradition=West | ||
|Has Original Language Of Version=Old French | |Has Original Language Of Version=Old French | ||
|Has Date Of Text Composition=1200-1250 | |||
|Has Source For Date Of Text Composition=Foerh-Janssens (1994) | |||
|Has Text Language=Old French | |Has Text Language=Old French | ||
|Has Modern Research Literature= | |Has Modern Research Literature=Berne-Aïache (1966); Coco (2016); Foehr-Janssens (1994); Le Roux de Lincy (1838); Paris (1876); Runte (1971); Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Speer (1981) | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{EmbeddedStory | {{EmbeddedStory | ||
| Line 72: | Line 74: | ||
|Has Narrator=Empress | |Has Narrator=Empress | ||
}} | }} | ||
Version L is unusually for a few reasons. First, it is worth noting that there are 13, rather than 15, stories: the final sage, usually called Merons in the French, is absent, as is the prince's story. Additionally, the two final stories - ''[[Noverca]]'' and ''[[Filia]]'' - are unique to this version. Their presence in texts that otherwise resemble Version A texts therefore serves as both evidence of the proximity of these two versions, and an argument for their cross-pollination. | |||
Revision as of 13:57, 23 May 2024
| Version | |
|---|---|
| Reference Number | |
| Author | |
| Title | Sept Sages de Rome |
| Siglum of the version of the Seven Sages | L (Sept Sages de Rome) |
| Version Number | |
| Branch of the tradition | West |
| Adapted from (version) | |
| Adapted into (version) | |
| Source for composition and adaptation information | |
| Original language of version | Old French |
| Translated into (languages) | |
| Place of composition | |
| Date of composition | 1200/1250 |
| Source for date of composition | Foerh-Janssens (1994) |
| Language of text | Old French |
| Regional or specific language of manuscript | |
| Modern research literature | Berne-Aïache (1966), Coco (2016), Foehr-Janssens (1994), Le Roux de Lincy (1838), Paris (1876), Runte (1971), Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014), Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984), Speer (1981) |
| Modern Editions | |
| General Notes (Internal) | |
Recorded secondary versions
Circle detected when trying to insert Arabic A into the tree.
Pattern of embedded stories in this version
| Short Story | Sequence Number | Narrator | Name Variations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arbor | 1 | Empress | |
| Canis | 2 | Bancillas | |
| Aper | 3 | Empress | |
| Medicus | 4 | Anxilles | |
| Gaza | 5 | Empress | |
| Puteus | 6 | Lantulles | |
| Senescalcus | 7 | Empress | |
| Tentamina | 8 | Malquidras | |
| Virgilius | 9 | Empress | |
| Avis | 10 | Cato | |
| Sapientes | 11 | Empress | |
| Noverca | 12 | Jesse | |
| Filia | 13 | Empress |
Connected manuscripts
Version L is unusually for a few reasons. First, it is worth noting that there are 13, rather than 15, stories: the final sage, usually called Merons in the French, is absent, as is the prince's story. Additionally, the two final stories - Noverca and Filia - are unique to this version. Their presence in texts that otherwise resemble Version A texts therefore serves as both evidence of the proximity of these two versions, and an argument for their cross-pollination.
