Bibliothèque nationale de France, français 189: Difference between revisions
From Seven Sages of Rome
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
|Has Modern Research Literature=Arlima: https://arlima.net/no/3182; JONAS: http://jonas.irht.cnrs.fr/manuscrit/77929; Paris (1876); Le Roux de Lincy (1838); Runte (1989); Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Foehr-Janssens (1994); Speer (1981); Speer (1989); Gilleland (1981); Roques (1983); Maulu (2016); Brereton (1953); Berne-Aïache (1966); Berne-Aïache (1977) | |Has Modern Research Literature=Arlima: https://arlima.net/no/3182; JONAS: http://jonas.irht.cnrs.fr/manuscrit/77929; Paris (1876); Le Roux de Lincy (1838); Runte (1989); Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Foehr-Janssens (1994); Speer (1981); Speer (1989); Gilleland (1981); Roques (1983); Maulu (2016); Brereton (1953); Berne-Aïache (1966); Berne-Aïache (1977) | ||
|Has Catalogue=Catalogue des manuscrits français, t. I: Ancien fonds, Paris, Firmin Didot, 1868, p. 15 (n° 189).; https://archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cc125648s | |Has Catalogue=Catalogue des manuscrits français, t. I: Ancien fonds, Paris, Firmin Didot, 1868, p. 15 (n° 189).; https://archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cc125648s | ||
|Has Note=Note on foliation: there is some discrepancy between the BNF catalogue, and external sites and scholarship (Arlima, JONAS, etc.). However, the BNF's statement of foliation also does not correspond with the foliation of their digitised version of the manuscript (which I have used to supply the folio range at the top of the page); therefore folio numbers should be taken under caution and double checked.<div></div> | |||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 08:00, 20 August 2024
Manuscript | |||
---|---|---|---|
Reference Number | Fr36 | ||
Location | Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France | ||
Siglum/Shelfmark | Français 189 (formerly Regius 6849) | ||
Page/Folio range | 298vb-335rb | ||
Standardised title of narrative | Sept Sages de Rome | ||
Incipit or textual title | A Romme eut jadis ung empereur qui eut a nom Deocliteus. Il avoit femme, de laquele lui demoura un hoir | ||
Version (siglum) | L (Sept Sages de Rome) | ||
└ Language Group within Version | French Version L | ||
└ Narrative/Scholarly Group within Version | |||
└ Further scholarly subgroup (1) | |||
└ Further scholarly subgroup (2) | |||
Translated/adapted from (Version/Text) | |||
Source for information on textual relationship to broader tradition | Foehr-Janssens (1994) | ||
Scribe | |||
Author | |||
Place of Manuscript Production | |||
Date of Manuscript Production | 1470 - 1480 | ||
Source of date Manuscript Production | BNF Catalogue: https://archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cc125648s | ||
Material | Parchment | ||
Language of Manuscript | Old French | ||
Regional or specific Language of Manuscript | |||
Source for regional or specific Language of Manuscript | |||
Prose or Verse | Prose | ||
Other texts in the Manuscript | 1ra-298rb: Le livre des merveilles, Ramon Llull
298vb-335rb: Le rommant des VII sages de Romme, version L | ||
Total pages/folios in Manuscript | 358 (?) | ||
Height | 384 | ||
Width | 282 | ||
Illustrations | Yes | ||
Digitisation | http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10467097w | ||
Modern Editions | Le Roux de Lincy, Roman des Sept Sages de Rome (1838) | ||
Catalogue | Catalogue des manuscrits français, t. I: Ancien fonds, Paris, Firmin Didot, 1868, p. 15 (n° 189)., https://archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cc125648s | ||
Modern Research Literature | Arlima: https://arlima.net/no/3182, JONAS: http://jonas.irht.cnrs.fr/manuscrit/77929, Paris (1876), Le Roux de Lincy (1838), Runte (1989), Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014), Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984), Foehr-Janssens (1994), Speer (1981), Speer (1989), Gilleland (1981), Roques (1983), Maulu (2016), Brereton (1953), Berne-Aïache (1966), Berne-Aïache (1977) | ||
General Notes (Internal) |
Note
Note on foliation: there is some discrepancy between the BNF catalogue, and external sites and scholarship (Arlima, JONAS, etc.). However, the BNF's statement of foliation also does not correspond with the foliation of their digitised version of the manuscript (which I have used to supply the folio range at the top of the page); therefore folio numbers should be taken under caution and double checked.