Würzburg Bibliothek des Priesterseminars Ms. chart. 2: Difference between revisions
From The Seven Sages of Rome
m Text replacement - "Has Content" to "Has Standardised Title Of Narrative" |
m Text replacement - "Prose Version H" to "Prosafassung / Prose Version" |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
|Has Siglum Of The Version Of The Seven Sages=H (Historia Septem Sapientum) | |Has Siglum Of The Version Of The Seven Sages=H (Historia Septem Sapientum) | ||
|Has Language Group Within Version=German Version H | |Has Language Group Within Version=German Version H | ||
|Has Narrative Or Scholarly Group Within Version=Prose Version | |Has Narrative Or Scholarly Group Within Version=Prosafassung / Prose Version | ||
|Has Source For Information On Textual Relationship to Broader Tradition=Handschriftencensus 6740: https://handschriftencensus.de/6740 | |Has Source For Information On Textual Relationship to Broader Tradition=Handschriftencensus 6740: https://handschriftencensus.de/6740 | ||
|Has Date Of Production=1400-1500 | |Has Date Of Production=1400-1500 | ||
Revision as of 16:36, 15 March 2024
Manuscript Identification
Reference Number
Ger27
Siglum / Shelfmark
Würzburg, Bibl. des Priesterseminars (früher Klerikalseminars), Ms. chart. 2
Page / Folio range
ff. 336-384
Textual Content & Tradition
Standardised title of narrative
Version (siglum)
Language Group within Version
Narrative / Scholarly Group within Version
Source for textual relationship
Authorship & Production
Date of Production
1400/1500
Source of Date of Production
Physical Description
Contents & Additional Texts
Other texts in the Manuscript
ff. 3-242: Bruder Berthold: 'Rechtssumme'
ff. 243-335: Psalms and Canticles
ff. 336-384: Sieben weise Meister (incomplete)Catalogues & Research Literature
Catalogue
Modern Research Literature
Research Material
| Has Research Material Title | Has Research Material Link | Has Research Material Description |
|---|
According to the Handschriftencensus page, this manuscript was likely burned in 1945. As such, any information about it relies on earlier codicology; see in particular Reuß (1843, 1844-45) and Vollmer (1933).
This text was incomplete; according to Reuß, pages were missing from the end of the narrative. Unlike the other German Prosafassung/Prose Versions of the text, this text was not assigned to a particular redaction or group.