München Bayerische Staatsbibliothek Clm 21049: Difference between revisions

The text on fol. 86r follows again on fol. 87r with the reference to fol. 86v, which contains only the following remark: Hic non est defectus quia hoc peruenit racione papiri et totum nichil valet in isto folio quia pro nullo supponit. (see Roth 2004, p.34).

Regarding 'date of manuscript production': Roth references various watermark analyses which result in a time range from 1444-1447 (see Roth 2004, p.34, footnote 30).

Authorship & Production

Place of Production

Benediktinerkloster Thierhaupten, Germany

Date of Production

1446

Source of Date of Production

Roth (2004)

Physical Description

Material

Paper

Total pages / folios

I + 128

Height

305

Width

215

Illustrations

No

Contents & Additional Texts

Other texts in the Manuscript

Ir-v : De XII virtutibus

2r-39v : De regimine principum 40r-v : Tugendschema (Virtus opponitur duabus maliciis...) 41r-47r : De arte et modo pugnandi (Excerpta de quodam libello pugna spiritualis intitulato), followed by 1 blank folio 48ra-101ra : Historia septem sapientum moralizata

101rb-127ra und 127v-128v : Gesta Romanorum moralizata

Catalogues & Research Literature

Catalogue

Modern Research Literature

Roth (2004), Halm / Laubmann (1878), Fischer (1902)

Research Material

Has Research Material Title	Has Research Material Link	Has Research Material Description

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 |Has Modern Research Literature=Roth (2004); Halm / Laubmann (1878); Fischer (1902)
 |Has Internal Notes=completed by Elisabeth Böttcher
-|Has Note=The text on fol. 86r follows again on fol. 87r with the reference to fol. 86v, which contains only the following remark: ''Hic non est defectus quia hoc peruenit racione papiri et totum nichil valet in isto folio quia pro nullo supponit''. (see Roth 2004, p.34)
+|Has Note=The text on fol. 86r follows again on fol. 87r with the reference to fol. 86v, which contains only the following remark: ''Hic non est defectus quia hoc peruenit racione papiri et totum nichil valet in isto folio quia pro nullo supponit''. (see Roth 2004, p.34).
+Regarding 'date of manuscript production': Roth references various watermark analyses which result in a time range from 1444-1447 (see Roth 2004, p.34, footnote 30).
 }}