M ('Male Marastre')

1. Home
2. Version
3. M ('Male Marastre')

Identification and general Information
Reference Number
Siglum of the version of the Seven Sages	M
Version Number
Title	Ystoire de la Male Marastre
Author

Tradition and Lineage
Branch of the tradition	West
Adapted from (version)	A (Seven Sages)
Adapted into (version)
Source for composition and adaptation information	Runte (1974)

Recorded secondary versions
M ('Male Marastre') French Version M

Connected manuscripts

Manuscript Language Location Date of Production Firenze Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Ashburnham 52 Old French Firenze, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana 1300 - 1350 Paris Bibliothèque de l'Arsenal 2998 Old French Paris, Bibliothèque de l'Arsenal 1400 - 1500 Paris Bibliothèque de l'Arsenal 2999 Old French Paris, Bibliothèque de l'Arsenal 1400 - 1500 Paris Bibliothèque nationale de France, français 573 Old French Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France 1400 - 1450

Language and Composition
Original language of version	Old French
Language of text	Old French
Regional or specific language of version
Translated into (languages)
Place of composition
Date of composition
Islamic date of composition
Hebrew date of composition
Source for date of composition	Runte (1974)

Modern Scholarship and Editions
Modern research literature
Modern Editions

Notes and Commentary
Note
Notes on motifs
Notes on the frame

Pattern of embedded stories in this version
Copy Embedded Stories Copy Embedded Stories × Select Target Page: Close Process

Connected prints
No connected prints

Version M is anomalous in a number of ways. The Prince is named Phiseus, and the stories titled Filius, Nutrix, Antenor, Spurius, Cardamum, and Assassinus are unique to Version M (replacing Puteus, Senescalcus, Tentatmina, Virgilius, Sapientes, and Rome in Version A).

In his introduction to his 1974 edition of the Ystoire, Runte also notes that although all seven sages are introduced by name, two of them - Malcuidanz and Martins - do not appear to tell their stories (1974, p. xxiii). Runte suggests that Lentulus appearing twice to tell both Vidua and Cardamum is simply due to scribal error. However, the fact that the final story is told by Markes (or Marcus), the son of the sage Cato/Chaton, is indicative of his unusual prominence in the narrative. This also serves as evidence of the links between Version M and the 'continuations' (or sequels) to the Seven Sages material, in particular Le Roman de Marques de Rome, which continues the story of Markes.