Overlap of Versions A and L

1. Home
2. Version
3. Overlap of Versions A and L

Identification and general Information
Reference Number
Siglum of the version of the Seven Sages	Overlap of Versions A and L
Version Number
Title	Sept Sages de Rome
Author

Tradition and Lineage
Branch of the tradition	West
Adapted from (version)
Adapted into (version)
Source for composition and adaptation information

Recorded secondary versions
Overlap of Versions A and L French A/L Overlap

Connected manuscripts

Manuscript Language Location Date of Production Brussel Koninklijke Bibliotheek 9245 Old French Brussel, Koninklijke Bibliotheek 1300 - 1350 Cambridge University Library MS Gg.6.28 Old French Cambridge University Library 1275 - 1300 Paris Bibliothèque de l'Arsenal 3354 Old French Paris, Bibliothèque de l'Arsenal 1400 - 1500 Paris Bibliothèque de l'Arsenal 3516 Old French Paris, Bibliothèque de l'Arsenal 1250 - 1300 Paris Bibliothèque nationale de France, français 95 Old French Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France c. 1280

Language and Composition
Original language of version	Old French
Language of text	Old French
Regional or specific language of version
Translated into (languages)
Place of composition
Date of composition
Islamic date of composition
Hebrew date of composition
Source for date of composition

Modern Scholarship and Editions
Modern research literature	ARLIMA: Les sept sages, Berne-Aïache (1966), Coco (2016), Foehr-Janssens (1994), Le Roux de Lincy (1838), Paris (1876), Runte (1971), Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014), Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984), Speer (1981)
Modern Editions

Notes and Commentary
Note
Notes on motifs
Notes on the frame

Pattern of embedded stories in this version
Has Short Title Has Sequence Number Has Narrator Has Name Variation Copy Embedded Stories Copy Embedded Stories × Select Target Page: Close Process

Connected prints
No connected prints

The texts attached to this version are those that are the subject of scholarly debate as to their placement in either Version A or Version L. These texts bear a range of distinctive differences, varying from text to text, that betray a cross-pollination between the two textual versions. Sometimes this is typified as part of a text copied verbatim from A, and other parts from L; in other cases, these texts adhere primarily to one tradition, but then borrow portions or embedded stories from the other. I am also including in this group all texts that Runte describes as having sixteen or seventeen stories, but otherwise following the Version A pattern, when those additional stories are those typical for Version L's distinctive pattern (Noverca and Filia).