Overlap of Versions A and L: Difference between revisions

From The Seven Sages of Rome
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Version
{{Version
|Has Description=The French texts attached to this version are those that are the subject of scholarly debate as to their placement in either [[A (Seven Sages)|Version A]] or [[L (Sept Sages de Rome)|Version L]]. These texts bear a range of distinctive differences, varying from text to text, that betray a cross-pollination between the two textual versions. Sometimes this is typified as part of a text copied verbatim from A, and other parts from L; in other cases, these texts adhere primarily to one tradition, but then borrow portions or embedded stories from the other. I am also including in this group all texts that Runte describes as having sixteen or seventeen stories, but otherwise following the Version A pattern, when those additional stories are those typical for Version L's distinctive pattern (''[[Noverca]]'' and ''[[Filia]]''). Please see individual manuscript pages for the story-order, as this varies from text to text.
|Has Title=Sept Sages de Rome
|Has Title=Sept Sages de Rome
|Has Siglum=Overlap of Versions A and L
|Has Siglum=Overlap of Versions A and L
|Has Branch Of Tradition=West
|Has Branch Of Tradition=West
|Is Adapted From=A (Seven Sages), L (Sept Sages de Rome)
|Has Original Language Of Version=Old French
|Has Original Language Of Version=Old French
|Has Text Language=Old French
|Has Text Language=Old French
|Has Modern Research Literature=ARLIMA: Les sept sages; Berne-Aïache (1966); Coco (2016); Foehr-Janssens (1994); Le Roux de Lincy (1838); Paris (1876); Runte (1971); Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Speer (1981)
|Has Modern Research Literature=ARLIMA: Les sept sages; Berne-Aïache (1966); Coco (2016); Foehr-Janssens (1994); Le Roux de Lincy (1838); Paris (1876); Runte (1971); Runte, Society of the Seven Sages Portal (2014); Runte, Wikeley, Farrell (1984); Speer (1981)
|Has Note=The texts attached to this version are those that are the subject of scholarly debate as to their placement in either Version A or Version L. These texts bear a range of distinctive differences, varying from text to text, that betray a cross-pollination between the two textual versions. Sometimes this is typified as part of a text copied verbatim from A, and other parts from L; in other cases, these texts adhere primarily to one tradition, but then borrow portions or embedded stories from the other. I am also including in this group all texts that Runte describes as having sixteen or seventeen stories, but otherwise following the Version A pattern, when those additional stories are those typical for Version L's distinctive pattern (''[[Noverca]]'' and ''[[Filia]]'').
|Has Note=See individual texts for embedded story order.
}}
}}

Revision as of 17:20, 26 February 2025

The French texts attached to this version are those that are the subject of scholarly debate as to their placement in either Version A or Version L. These texts bear a range of distinctive differences, varying from text to text, that betray a cross-pollination between the two textual versions. Sometimes this is typified as part of a text copied verbatim from A, and other parts from L; in other cases, these texts adhere primarily to one tradition, but then borrow portions or embedded stories from the other. I am also including in this group all texts that Runte describes as having sixteen or seventeen stories, but otherwise following the Version A pattern, when those additional stories are those typical for Version L's distinctive pattern (Noverca and Filia). Please see individual manuscript pages for the story-order, as this varies from text to text.