München Universitätsbibliothek 2° Cod. ms. 672

From Seven Sages of Rome
Revision as of 15:46, 21 August 2024 by Boettcher (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Manuscript |Has Reference Number=Latin57 |Has Location=München, Universitätsbibliothek |Has Siglum=2° Cod. ms. 672 |Has Page Range=176ra-198va |Has Standardised Title Of Narrative=Historia Septem Sapientum |Has Incipit Or Textual Title=Incipit Historia de filio imperatoris et de VII sapientibus Diocletianus regnavit in civitate Romana dives valde |Has Siglum Of The Version Of The Seven Sages=H (Historia Septem Sapientum) |Has Language Group Within Version=Latin Vers...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Manuscript
Reference Number Latin57
Location München, Universitätsbibliothek
Siglum/Shelfmark 2° Cod. ms. 672
Page/Folio range 176ra-198va
Standardised title of narrative Historia Septem Sapientum
Incipit or textual title Incipit Historia de filio imperatoris et de VII sapientibus Diocletianus regnavit in civitate Romana dives valde
Version (siglum) H (Historia Septem Sapientum)
Language Group within Version Latin Version H
Narrative/Scholarly Group within Version Group IV
Further scholarly subgroup (1)
Further scholarly subgroup (2) Text M12
Translated/adapted from (Version/Text)
Source for information on textual relationship to broader tradition Roth (2004)
Scribe Donatus
Author
Place of Manuscript Production Schottenkloster St. Jakob, Regensburg, Germany
Date of Manuscript Production 1400/1433
Source of date Manuscript Production Roth (2004)
Material Paper
Language of Manuscript Latin
Regional or specific Language of Manuscript
Source for regional or specific Language of Manuscript
Prose or Verse Prose
Other texts in the Manuscript
Script style/form
Total pages/folios in Manuscript 356
Height 290
Width 205
Illustrations No
Digitisation
Modern Editions Roth, Historia Septem Sapientum (2004)
Catalogue
Modern Research Literature Roth (2004)Moldenhauer (1923a)Daniel / Kornrumpf (1979)

Note

Regarding place of production, Roth put a questionmark behind the provenience (see Roth 2004, p.84).