Parma Biblioteca Palatina Parm. 2291

From Seven Sages of Rome
Revision as of 15:51, 31 October 2024 by Bonsall (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Manuscript
Reference Number Heb11
Location Parma, Biblioteca Palatina
Siglum/Shelfmark Parm. 2291 (De Rossi 1049)
Page/Folio range 16v-22c
Standardised title of narrative משלי סנדבר (Mishle Sendebar)
Incipit or textual title
Version (siglum) Mishle Sendebar
Language Group within Version Hebrew Mishle Sendebar
Narrative/Scholarly Group within Version Hebrew Group A
Further scholarly subgroup (1)
Further scholarly subgroup (2)
Translated/adapted from (Version/Text)
Source for information on textual relationship to broader tradition Epstein (1967)
Scribe
Author
Place of Manuscript Production
Date of Manuscript Production 1450 - 1500
Source of date Manuscript Production Richler (2001)
Material Paper
Language of Manuscript Hebrew
Regional or specific Language of Manuscript
Source for regional or specific Language of Manuscript
Prose or Verse Prose
Other texts in the Manuscript From Richler (2001):

1. F. 2r: אלההחרוזיםעשהר׳שמואלכשמהאישאיששאמרו

שהואהיהעניוהיהמספדעלעצמו Poem by Samuel on the merits of wisdom versus riches.

2. Ff. 3r-15r: ספרזרחהנקראמנחתיהודההמכונהשונא

Judah הנשים b. Isaac ibn Shabbetai's satirical maqama on women, Minhat Yehudah Sone ha-Nashim.

3. Ff. 16v-22v: משליסנדבד Tales of Sendebar

Total pages/folios in Manuscript 22
Height 213
Width 141
Illustrations No
Digitisation https://www.nli.org.il/en/manuscripts/NNL_ALEPH990000790290205171/NLI#$FL15117114
Modern Editions
Catalogue Richler, Hebrew Manuscripts in the Biblioteca Palatina in Parma: Catalogue (2001)https://www.nli.org.il/en/manuscripts/NNL_ALEPH990000790290205171/NLI#$FL15117114
Modern Research Literature Epstein (1967)
General Notes (Internal)

Note

The version of Mishle Sendebar contained here is partially fragmentary; Epstein notes, 'the MS is defective, breaking off on fol. 6r after the fifth line, in the middle of the story Gibbosi, and picking up four lines from the foot of the page. A note in the margin on fol. 6 r indicates that the copyist had a defective MS before him but was aware that the gap was not too great" (p. 349). Other than that, it is 'almost identical' to the earliest printed edition, Con 1516 (Richler 2001, p. 408). Given its similarity, Epstein suggests this may be a source for Con 1516.

On dating, Richler notes: 'watermarks similar to Briquet no. 4745, dated 1482' (p. 408).